http://w.atwiki.jp/icugakuy/ icugakuy @ ウィキ ja 2012-06-18T11:44:50+09:00 1339987490 https://w.atwiki.jp/icugakuy/pages/13.html 思いつく限りのキリスト教など,信仰や平和への想いを支えとして、 実践の方たちを紹介してください。この人たちから講演会を依頼する 犬養道子氏：世界の飢餓や難民の問題に深く関わり、 　　　　　　　　キリスト教理念に基づいた犬養道子基金も設立。 　　　　　　　　参考：http://www.inukai-kikin.jp/　（さくらこ） 2012-06-18T11:44:50+09:00 1339987490 https://w.atwiki.jp/icugakuy/pages/20.html &bold(){*Shall we make a CAKE?} 北中先生と新入生とのWelcome Partyのために、みんなでケーキ作りできたら、楽しいですね♪ そこで皆さんに質問です！何ケーキが作りたいですか？ e.g. バナナケーキ・チョコレートケーキ・チーズケーキetc. 日時：５月１０日（月）７限 場所：陽一さん宅＠カナダハウス 回答よろしくお願いします＾＾　※複数回答可です。 ************************************************************************************************************** -バナナケーキ（さくらこ） 　失敗が少なそうですし、「とっても高価」ではなさそうかな？ 　また、炎天下の下でも腐りにくいはず（あんりガーデンにて）。 　北中先生とのランチ交流会でチョコレートがほとんど溶ける事件が発生したので…！ -クッキー←ケーキではない…。お菓子という意味で提案です！（櫻子） 　単純にバタークッキーを食べたい気分なので。 -フルーツいっぱいのロールケーキ（さくらこ） 　美味しそう…。想像しただけでわくわくしてしまいます。　 -パウンドケーキ（さくらこ） 　こちらもフルーツたっぷりで！ -チョコレートケーキ（さくらこ） 　お誕生日の時に陽一さんが作られたもの。 -リスト -リスト ●質問●（さくらこより） 締め切りはいつですか？ そして、いつ最終決定を下し、どのようにレシピを決め、いつ誰が材料の買出しに行くのですか。 →買出しは、寮生ですし、進んで参ります！ ●その他●（さくらこより） 御殿場のお土産はこの時に持参いたしますね。 ただし12人分しかありませんが。 あと、なんだかたくさん書いてしまい、ごめんなさい！！ 考えるだけで楽しくなってついつい……。 歓迎ランチももちろんですが、ケーキ作りが、私はとっても楽しみなのです。 2012-06-18T11:43:56+09:00 1339987436 https://w.atwiki.jp/icugakuy/pages/23.html ●2010年度春学期お疲れ様パーティー ・25日に買い出しをできる人 　－ちゃきさん 　－さやかさん 　－さくらこ（多分） ・26日に15時から料理をできる人 　－兄さん 　－さくらこ ・26日に19時以降にいられる人（＝食べられる人） 　－兄さん 　－かぎさん 　－ちゃきさん（18時から） 　－さくらこ ・メニュー 　－フランスパン 　　・フランスパン 　　・バター 　－飲み物 　　・水 　－サラダ（作り方は兄さん） 　　・アプリコットリンゴ酢 　　・オリーブオイル 　　・粒胡椒 　　・（濃厚な）山羊チーズ 　－白身魚のソテー（作り方はさくらこ） 　　・タラ 　　・バター（油） 　　・小麦粉 　　・塩 　　・胡椒 　－鶏肉ときのこのクリーム煮（作り方と材料は兄さん） 　－餃子（作り方はさやかさん？） 　　・にんにく 　　・にら 　　・キャベツ 　　・玉ねぎ 　　・豚ひき肉 　　・餃子の皮 　－ソルベ（作り方→http://cookcheck.livedoor.biz/archives/51275489.html） 　　・スイカ 　　・砂糖 　　・ゼラチン 　　・寒天 　　・水 　－鶏肉と玉ねぎと人参のみじん切りのトマトシチュー（作り方と材料は兄さん） 　－チーズ（どなたがお選びになりますか？） 　－食後に 　　・アールグレー（兄さんのをいただけると良いわねえと話していました） 　　・バニラアイスクリーム 2012-06-18T11:42:24+09:00 1339987344 https://w.atwiki.jp/icugakuy/pages/17.html Study Trip調査、第二弾！ こちらは行きたい場所調査です。 ご希望の地名とできたら理由、行き方などをご記入ください。 地名だけでも良いですよ！ 最終的にはテーマや予算などによって決定しますが、 今後の活動に活かすためにも、ふと頭に浮かんだ場所で構いません！ ・横浜（さくらこ） 　理由：昨年横浜の教会巡りをするという話があったのに実現しなかったから。 　行き方：ご参考までにICUからは電車で2時間ほどです。 　　　　　近いので現地集合も考えられますね！ 　　　　　わざわざ三鷹市で集まる必要はなさそうです。 ・寿町《横浜と上にありますが…》（さくらこ） 　どのような町かは↓をご覧ください。 　http://fuumaru.ld.infoseek.co.jp/nyuumon.html 　行き方： 　（一例として、ICUキャンパスから、一番安い方法） 　富士重工前（バス210円）吉祥寺（井の頭線190円）渋谷（東横線260円）横浜（京浜東北線150円）石川町（徒歩6分）寿町　 ・アジア学院 　理由：発展途上国の有機農学指導者を育成する働きをみる。 　ワークキャンプ（一泊、３９００円）とワーキングビジター（２泊から、一泊２２００円）の二択がある模様。 　行き方：電車で、３時間半ほど、交通費は武蔵境から３０００円弱です。 　ほかにも、夏に、日本の第二次世界大戦で死んだ捕虜の方を悼んでの和解の礼拝が毎年８月ごろ行われています。 　印象深い礼拝のようですよ。これは日帰りですので、予算には無理がないでしょう。 ・基督教独立学園高等学校（さくらこ） 　レンタカーで陽ちゃんとちゃきさん、Shokoが代わる代わる運転をして行く案が出ています。 　宿泊は一泊700円（でしたっけ？）で、シーツ、枕カバー（タオル）、洗面用具が必要だそうです。 　参考HP：http://www.dokuritsugakuen.com/ 2012-06-18T11:41:32+09:00 1339987292 https://w.atwiki.jp/icugakuy/pages/14.html 以下のURLに飛んで、候補のサークルを教えてください。 http://www.icu.ac.jp/campuslife/clublist.html また、ホームレス関連のサークルなど、このリストになくてキリスト教系のサークルを書いてください。 どうせなら、楽しくやりましょう！No1のように息抜きに一言でも、コメントしてはどうでしょうか？ No1　劇団虹 コメント：地域の老人ホームや子供たちのために劇をやっているサークル。発展途上国の子供の為に劇をやるなど、教育的、社会的なことを考えているみたいだよ。（陽一） レス： ①とってもいい人たちで、キリスト教への抵抗も少ない人が２人いました。キリスト教を励みとしながら、平和のために演劇をするという団体などいいかもね（具体例担当者） ②賛成 ③②番さん、名前書いて(具体例担当) ④ごめんごめん、具体例担当です。 No.2　Trade Fair ICU コメント：キリスト教に関係があるのかどうかは分かりません。 　　　　　けれども、世界の平和につながる活動をしていることは確かです。（さくらこ） レス： ① No.3　シンポシオン コメント：「性的指向やジェンダーアイデンティティ（性自認）を理由に行われる、 　　　　　国際基督教大学内のLGBIT（レズビアン・ゲイ・バイセクシュアル・ 　　　　　インターセックス・トランスジェンダーをはじめとする 　　　　　セクシュアルマイノリティーズ）に対する、あらゆる差別・暴力・誹謗・ 　　　　　中傷に反対し、これらの理由で苦しんでいる全ての人々が、 　　　　　生まれながらにして持っているはずの人権を享受できるようすることを 　　　　　目的とする」サークルです。（シンポシオンのホームページより引用） 　　　　　No.2と同様、キリスト教が根底にあるかは分かりません。 　　　　　けれどもこれもまた、平和につながる一歩を作り出している 　　　　　サークルですよね。（さくらこ） レス： ① No.4　日本ルワンダ学生会議 コメント：1994年に大量虐殺（ジェノサイド）が起こり、ポストジェノサイドと 　　　　　貧困の問題に直面しながら民族間の和解と発展への取り組みを進めている 　　　　　ルワンダの人々との協力関係を考えているインカレ団体。 　　　　　過去のディスカッション内容には、虐殺のイデオロギー・ルワンダでの和解の取り組み・ 　　　　　若者のリーダーシップ・マイノリティと人権問題・南京大虐殺・日本の戦後復興・ 　　　　　日本の経済格差・日本の官僚制度などがあるそうです。 　　　　　ホームページ：http://jp-rw.jimdo.com/（さくらこ） ☆さくらこより☆ コメント：思うのですが、キリスト教に関係なくても、平和を求めている団体はたくさんあり、 　　　　　平和を考える上で、宗教は気にする必要は無いのではないでしょうか。 　　　　　学Yはキリスト教に基づいているけれど、みんなで平和を考える会を開くにあたって 　　　　　コラボをする団体はキリスト教と関係なくてもいいのではないかな、と考えました。 　　　　　もちろん、陽一さんの仰るとおり、平和活動をしている団体の活動の源に 　　　　　聖書の教えが関係しているということは少なからずあると思うのですが、 　　　　　それはその団体のあり方で、たとえば、その源にコーランの教えが関係している 　　　　　イスラム教の団体があるかもしれません。 　　　　　その場合、この講演会を開くにあたってキリスト教系の団体、と絞ってしまうと、 　　　　　イスラム教の考え方を除いて考えることにつながりかねません。 　　　　　ですから、提案者である私たち学Yがキリスト教精神に基づいた団体であることを 　　　　　分かって下さる団体であれば、一緒に講演会を開くことができると私は考えます。 　　　　　そして、どのような信仰が根底にある団体とのコラボでも最終的には、 　　　　　共に聖書を開き、平和を考える、それだけでとっても素敵な会になるのでは 　　　　　ないかなあと想像しています。 2012-06-18T11:39:29+09:00 1339987169 https://w.atwiki.jp/icugakuy/pages/24.html Week 3 Apr. 19 Social Relationships and Adaptation to Life Stress: II Discussion Questions: 1. For what kinds of potential confounds do social support researchers need to be vigilant in their investigations? What approaches are useful in dealing with these confounds? 2. Many researchers are keenly interested in identifying the underlying mechanisms that account for the hypothesized beneficial effects of social support. What mechanisms have been postulated to account for the association between social support and physical health? between social support and mental health? How might these causal mechanisms be studied empirically? 3. How might these causal mechanisms be studied empirically? 4. Some researchers have argued that individuals' needs for social support and their response to social support will differ at different stages in the process of adapting to a major life stress. What kinds of temporal models have been proposed? How persuasive do you find these models to be? 5. Much of the research on social support examines contemporaneous associations between current social support and current health status. Yet the etiology of many illnesses has a long time course. How should social support be investigated to reflect the temporal course of various kinds of physical or mental illness? 6. Similarly, experiences in social relationships unfold over a person’s life time. To what extent might the cumulative effects of such experiences differ from the effects of current social relationships and interactions? How might we attempt to capture such cumulative effects? Reading Assignment: Cohen, S. (l988). Psychosocial models of the role of social support in the etiology of physical disease. Health Psychology, 7, 269-297. Cohen, S., Doyle, W.J., Turner, R., Alper, C. M., & Skoner, D. B. (2003). Sociability and susceptibility to the common cold. Psychological Science, 14, 389-395. Jacobson, D. E. (1986). Types and timing of social support. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 27, 250-264. Seeman,T. E., & McEwen, B. S. (1996). Impact of social environment characteristics on neuroendocrine regulation. Psychosomatic Medicine, 58, 459–471. Thoits, P. A. (1982). Conceptual, methodological, and theoretical problems in studying social support as a buffer against life stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 23, 145-159. Uchino, B., Caciopo, J. T., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (1996). The relationship between social support and physiological processes: A review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications for health. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 488-531. -------- Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., Sheridan, J.F., & McClintock, M. K. (2000). Multi-level integrative analyses of human behavior: Social neuroscience and the complementing nature of social and biological approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 829-843. (optional) Kennedy, J., Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Glaser, R. (1990). Social support, stress, and the immune system. In B. R. Sarason, I. G. Sarason, & G. R. Pierce (Eds), Social support: An interactional view (pp. 253-266). New York: Wiley. (optional) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Week 4 Social Support: Current Controversies, Critiques, and Intriguing Issues Apr. 26 1) Researchers differ in the extent to which they view social support as an objective or subjective state. What is the nature of this controversy? What kind of evidence would tend to substantiate each perspective? Why does this distinction matter for research? for potential interventions? In a related vein, a consensus is emerging among many researchers that "perceived support" matters more for well-being than "received support." What is the strength of the empirical evidence for this claim? 2) What does research on “invisible” support suggest about the kinds of interpersonal processes or transactions in close relationships that are most beneficial to health? The research on invisible support has been conducted primarily with healthy adults. Do you think the findings from this work generalize to ill individuals, such as those coping with chronic illness? Why or why not? 3) The effects of social support have not always been found to be positive, particularly in studies of emotional health or mental health. Stress-buffering effects appear inconsistently, and instrumental support has been associated in some research with negative, rather than, positive outcomes. How should we reconcile this work with generalizations that prevail in the literature about the beneficial effects of social support? 4) What implications for our research designs, sampling strategies, assessment procedures, and data analyses stem from consideration of the chronicity of some human disorders? For example, in studying the role of social support in predicting levels of depression, how might our results change if we include vs. exclude individuals with a history of chronic depression. More generally, how might our understanding of the association between interpersonal processes and health be affected by systematic attention to the chronicity (or stability) of the outcomes under investigation? 5) On what conceptual grounds has research on social support been criticized? On what methodological grounds has this research been criticized? Which of these various criticisms do you find most compelling? How might these (or other) criticisms be addressed in future research? Reading Assignment: Bolger, N., Zuckerman, A., & Kessler, R. C. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 953-961. Burton, E., Stice, E., Seeley, J. R. (2004). A prospective test of the stress-buffering model of depression in adolescent girls: No support once again. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 689-697. Coyne, J. C., & Bolger, N. (1990). Doing without social support as an explanatory concept. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 148-158. Kessler, R. (1992). Perceived support and adjustment to stress: Methodological considerations. In H. O. F. Veiel & U. Baumann (Eds.), The meaning and measurement of social support (pp. 259- 271). Washington, DC: Hemisphere. Lakey, B., & Cassady, P. F. (1990). Cognitive processes in perceived social support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1-7. Lieberman, M. A. (1986). Social supports - the consequences of psychologizing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 461-465. Monroe, S. M., & Johnson, S. L. (1992). Social support, depression, and other mental disorders. In retrospect and toward future prospects. In H. O. F. Veiel & U. Baumann (Eds.), The meaning and measurement of social support (pp. 93-105). Washington, DC: Hemisphere. -------- Dunkel-Schetter, C., & Bennet, T. L. (1990). Differentiating the cognitive and behavioral aspects of social support. In B. R. Sarason, I. G. Sarason, & G. R. Pierce (Eds), Social support: An interactional view (pp. 267-296). New York: Wiley. (optional) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Week 5 A) Social Networks, Health, and Mortality May 3 B) Loneliness and Health A) Discussion Questions: 1. A sizable literature has emerged that links involvement in social networks to mortality. Although specific studies vary, they share many features in common. How would you describe a typical study? What potential confounds and alternative explanations have been considered in these studies? Have any been overlooked? How has the association between social network indicators and mortality been interpreted (what explanations have been offered)? What appear to be promising directions for advancing this literature, either conceptually or methodologically? 2. Much of the evidence in this literature is derived from longitudinal studies that were initiated before the evolution of sophisticated approaches to conceptualizing and measuring social support and social network involvement. Yet, across these studies, an assortment of relatively "crude" measures of support/involvement has proved to be rather effective in predicting mortality. What should we make of the fact that these simple measures perform as well as they do? 3. The literatures on the health effects of social support and the health effects of loneliness have developed largely in isolation of each other. Should these literatures be integrated in some fashion? Do they offer distinctive or duplicative (redundant) conceptual perspectives and empirical findings? For example, is loneliness synonymous with a lack of social support? If not, how do they differ? 4. What health effects of loneliness have been documented in the literature? What mediating mechanisms have been posited to account for these effects? Reading Assignment: Berkman, L. F., & Syme, S. L. (1979). Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: A nine- year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. American Journal of Epidemiology, 109, 186-204. Berkman, L. F., Glass, T., Brissette, I., & Seeman, T. E. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millenium. Social Science and Medicine, 51, 843-857. Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2002). Loneliness and pathways to disease. Brain, behavior, and immunity. Marangoni, C., & Ickes, W. (1989). Loneliness: A theoretical review with implications for measurement. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 93-128. ------- Cacioppo, J. T., Hawkley, L. C., & Bernston, G. C. (2003). The anatomy of loneliness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 71-74. (optional) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Week 6 May 10 Social Relationships as a Source of Social Control Discussion Questions: 1. What is the historical origin of researchers' interest in social control? How has social control generally been defined in the sociological literature? How does social control differ conceptually from health-related social support? How could health-related social control and social support be distinguished empirically? 2. Through what specific mechanisms is social control believed to affect health outcomes? How could these various mechanisms be studied, and their distinctive effects distinguished? 3. Some theorists believe that social control has dual effects (on health behavior and psychological well-being, respectively). What does this mean? How might the dual effects hypothesis be investigated? In the assigned readings, social role obligations are posited to promote better health behavior. Can you think of circumstances when this would not be true? How might we elaborate "social control theory" to provide a basis for predicting when social role obligations would have beneficial vs. detrimental effects on health behavior? 4. How has social control typically been studied? From what limitations do these approaches suffer? How have researchers attempted to grapple with the threat of selection (or “social drift”) in their studies of the health effects of being married, being a parent, etc.? What alternative methodologies seem promising for investigating the health effects of social control in personal relationships? 5. How might we seek to integrate theoretical and methodological perspectives on social support and social control in studying interpersonal processes and health? For example, to what extent might efforts to provide social support and efforts to exercise social control within a relationship represent compatible versus incompatible relationship functions? How could we investigate these joint effects in empirical studies? 6. Some forms of health-related “influence” in social networks serve to undermine, rather than foster, sound health practices. Examples might include peer initiation into substance use or peer undermining of compliance with medical regimens. This sometimes been termed “negative social control.” Do you think this is a useful construct, or is it redundant with existing constructs that address the same phenomena? How might existing theoretical perspectives be developed to allow us to develop hypotheses about the presence and effects of positive vs. negative forms of social control in social networks? Reading Assignment: Burman, B., & Margolin, G. (1992). Analysis of the association between marital relationships and health problems: An interactional perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 39-63. Helgeson, V. S., Novak, S. A., Lepore, S. J., & Eton, D. T. (2004). Spouse social control efforts: Relations to health behavior and well-being among men with prostate cancer. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 53-68. Hughes, M., & Gove, W. R. (l981). Living alone, social integration, and mental health. American Journal of Sociology, 87, 48-74. Lewis, M. A., & Rook, K. S. (1999). Social control in personal relationships: Impact on health behaviors and psychological distress. Health Psychology, 18, 63-71. Rook, K. S. (1990). Social networks as a source of social control in older adults' lives. In H. Giles, N. Coupland, & J. Wiemann (Eds.), Communication, health, and the elderly (pp. 45-63). Manchester, England: University of Manchester Press. Umberson, D. (1987). Family status and health behaviors: Social control as a dimension of social integration. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 28, 306-319. -------- Tucker, J. S. (2002). Health-related social control within older adults’ relationships. Journal of Gerontology:Psychological Sciences, 57, P387-P395. (optional) Westmaas, J. L.,. Wild, T. C., & Ferrence, R. (2002). Effects of gender in social control of smoking cessation. Health Psychology, 21, 368–376. (optional) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Week 7 May 17 Social Relationships as a Source of Stress/Conflict Discussion Questions: 1. Why is it important to consider the implications for health of negative as well as positive aspects of social network involvement? 2. How have the negative aspects of social ties been conceptualized? What categorizations or taxonomies have been developed? How do these taxonomies compare with those developed by social support researchers? What approaches have been developed for assessing negative social exchanges? 3. How has the association between negative social exchanges and health (physical or emotional) typically been studied? What are some of the limitations of this approach? What alternative approaches appear promising? 4. Some research has sought specifically to compare the effects on health of negative versus positive social interactions. How have these effects typically been compared? What conclusions about these effects have emerged from work conducted thus far? From what kinds of limitations does this "comparative" research suffer? 5. What explanations have been offered for the apparently disproportionate effects of negative social interactions that have been documented in some studies? What other explanations seem plausible? How might these explanations be tested? 6. What does existing research suggest about the covariation between positive and negative interaction within particular dyads, within a social network? How persuasive is this research? How might it be improved? 7. What directions for future research seem most promising? Reading Assignment: Coyne, J. C., Wortman, C. B., & Lehman, D. R. (1988). The other side of support: Emotional overinvolvement and miscarried helping. In B. H. Gottlieb (Ed.), Marshaling social support: Formats, processes, and effects (pp. 305-330). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Ewart, C. K., Taylor, C. B., Kraemer, H. C., & Agras, W. S. (1991). High blood pressure and marital discord: Not being nasty matters more than being nice. Health Psychology, 10, 155-163. Finch, J. F., Okun, M. A., Pool, G. J., & Ruehlman, L. S. (1999). A comparison of the influence of conflictual and supportive social interactions on psychological distress. Journal of Personality, 67, 581-621. Rook, K. S. (1990). Stressful aspects of older adults' social relationships: An overview of current theory and research. In M.A.P. Stephens, J. H. Crowther, S. E. Hobfoll, & D. L. Tennenbaum (Eds.), Stress and coping in later life families (pp. 173-192). Washington, DC: Hemisphere. Rook, K. S. (1998). Investigating the positive and negative sides of personal relationships: Through a lens darkly? B. H. Spitzberg & W. R. Cupach (Eds.), The dark side of close relationships (pp. 369-393). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. ------- Harris, T. O. (1992). Some reflections on the process of social support and nature of unsupportive behaviors. In H. O. F. Veiel & U. Baumann (Eds.), The meaning and measurement of social support (pp. 171-190). Washington, DC: Hemisphere. (optional) Kessler, R. C., McLeod, J. D., & Wethington, E. (1985). The costs of caring: A perspective on the relationship between sex and psychological distress. In I. G. Sarason & B. R. Sarason (Eds.), Social support: Theory, research and applications (pp. 491-506). The Hague, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff. (optional) Schuster, T. L., Kessler, R. C., & Aseltine, R. H., Jr. (l989). Positive interactions, negative interactions, and depressed mood. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 423-438. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Week 8 May 24 A) Determinants of Social Support: Person and Environmental Factors B) Special Topics (TBD based on class members’ interests) – e.g., gender differences; interpersonal processes in the context of chronic illness Discussion Questions: 1. Some theorists argue that social support resides more in the eye of the beholder than in the responses of the immediate social environment - that social support is a stable, trait-like characteristic that emerges from early experiences with caregivers (parents and others). What links do they postulate? How has attachment theory been applied to the study of social support? 2. What role might social skill (or social competence) play in shaping the kind of social supoprt a person has? Based on the study by Cohen et al., does social competence) appear to influence levels of social support or to account for the stress-buffering effects of social support? What further research would be valuable in examining the implications of individual differences in social skill? 3. How might features of the social environment and broader social structure influence the kind of social support people have? 4. TBD Reading Assignment: Berkman, L. F., Glass, T., Brissette, I., & Seeman, T. E. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millenium. Social Science and Medicine, 51, 843-857. Cohen, S., Sherrod, D. R., & Clark, M. S. (1986). Social skills and the stress-protective role of social support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 963-973. Collins, N. L., & Feeney, B. C. (2004). Working models of attachment shape perceptions of social support: Evidence From experimental and observational studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 363-383. House, J. S., Umberson, D., & Landis, K. (1988). Structures and processes of social support. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 293-318. (Note: This was listed as an optional reading for Week 2) Sarason, B. R., Pierce, G. R., Shearin, E. N., Sarason, I. G., & Waltz, J. A. (1991). Perceived social support and working models of self and actual others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 273-287. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Week 9 Loss or Disruption of Important Social Relationships May 31 Reading Assignment: TBD ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Week 10 Jun. 6 Applications: The Design and Evaluation of Interventions Discussion Questions: 1. What can practitioners/interventionists learn from theoretical and empirical work on interpersonal processes and health? What kinds of quandaries do practitioners face in seeking to draw upon research to guide their interventions? 20 2. What can researchers learn from interventions that seek to enhance people's emotional or physical health by influencing their social relationships in some way? 30 3. What kinds of underlying assumptions (explicit or implicit) have guided researchers' efforts to derive recommendations for intervention from their work? To what extent do these assumptions appear warranted? 30 4. How can we encourage greater collaboration among basic researchers, applied researchers, and practitioners? What kinds of barriers appear to interfere with meaningful collaboration? 20 5. What lessons can be drawn from existing intervention studies, including those that have been unsuccessful? Do common themes or issues cut across these "failed" intervention studies? 20 6. Why do correlational studies and intervention studies of social support processes sometimes yield dissimilar results? 20 Reading Assignment: Gottlieb, B. H. (1992). Quandaries in translating support concepts to intervention. In H. O. F. Veiel & U. Baumann (Eds.), The meaning and measurement of social support (pp. 293-309). New York: Hemisphere. Helgeson, V. S., & Cohen, S. (1996). Social support and adjustment to cancer: Reconciling descriptive, correlational, and intervention research. Health Psychology, 15, 135-148. Heller, K., Thompson, M. G., Trueba, P. E., Hogg, J. R., & Vlachos-Weber, I. (1991). Peer support telephone dyads for elderly women: Was this the wrong intervention? American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 53-74. (See also commentaries published in the same issue.) Kiesler, C. A. (1985). Policy implications of research on social support and health. In S. Cohen & L. Syme (Eds.), Social support and health (pp. 347-364). Orlando, FL: Academic Press. Rook, K. S. & Dooley, D. (1985). Applying social support research: Theoretical problems and future directions. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 5-28. Source Books and Special Journal Issues Cohen, S., & Syme, S. L. (Eds.) (1985). Social support and health. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. Cohen, S., Underwood, L. G., & Gottlieb, B. H. (Eds.) (2000). Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. . Duck, S. (Ed.) (1988, 1997). Handbook of personal relationships. Chichester, England: Wiley. Duck, S., & Silver, R. C. (Eds.) (1990). Personal relationships and social support. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Gottlieb, B. H. (Ed.) (1981). Social networks and social support. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Gottlieb, B. H. (1983). Social support strategies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Gottlieb, B. H. (Ed.) (1988). Marshaling social support: Formats, processes, and effects. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. House, J. S. (l981). Work stress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Knipscheer, C. P. M., & Antonucci, C. C. (Eds.) (1990). Social network research. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger. Milardo, R. (Ed.) (1988). Families and social networks. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Pierce, G. R., Sarason, B. R., & Sarason, I. B. (1996). Handbook of social support and the family. New York: Plenum. Pilisuk, M. (1986). The healing web: Social networks and human survival. Hanover, NH : University Press of New England. Sarason, B. R., Sarason, I.G., & Pierce, G. R. (Eds.) (1990). Social support: An interactional view. New York: Wiley. Sarason, I. G., & Sarason, B. R. (Eds.) (1985), Social support: Theory, research and applications. The Hague, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff. Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R.. (1998). The dark side of close relationships. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. Vaux, A. (l988). Social support: Theory, research, and intervention. New York: Praeger. Veiel, H. O. F., & Baumann, U. (Eds.) (1992). The meaning and measurement of social support. Washington, DC: Hemisphere. The following special journal issues that focused on social support or social networks: Journal of Social Issues, 1984 (vol. 40, no. 4) and 1985 (vol. 41, no.1) Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1990, (vol. 9, no. ) Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1990 (vol. 7, no. 4) and 1992, (vol. 9, no. 3) Communication Research, 1992 (vol. 19, no. 2) 2010-11-20T11:18:23+09:00 1290219503 https://w.atwiki.jp/icugakuy/pages/1.html 平和活動をしているサークル名 http://www26.atwiki.jp/icugakuy/pages/14.html コンタクトをする平和実践している人達 http://www26.atwiki.jp/icugakuy/pages/13.html 予算調査 http://www26.atwiki.jp/icugakuy/pages/16.html 行き先調査 http://www26.atwiki.jp/icugakuy/pages/17.html Shall we make a CAKE?? http://www26.atwiki.jp/icugakuy/pages/20.html 2010年度春学期お疲れ様パーティー http://www26.atwiki.jp/icugakuy/pages/23.html マニュアルなどのページ http://www26.atwiki.jp/icugakuy/pages/15.html 2010-06-10T21:36:39+09:00 1276173399 https://w.atwiki.jp/icugakuy/pages/16.html Study Tripについて予算の調査を行います。 日程と行く場所を決めるにあたって、 お一人当たりの予算を教えてください。 それをもとにこれからの調査を行っていきますので、 皆さんよろしくお願いいたします。 （学Yの会計のお金は当てにしないでくださいね。） 匿名アンケートです。 締め切りは5月15日（土）です。 でもお忘れにならないうちにお早めに！ Study Tripのために費やすことのできる上限の金額を選んで 投票ボタンを押してください。 よろしくお願いいたします。 #vote(無料（徒歩圏内になりますね）[0],499円以下[0],500円[0],1000円[0],1500円[0],2000円[1],2500円[0],3000円[0],3500円[0],4000円[0],4500円[0],5000円[2],5500円[1],6000円[0],6500円[0],7000円[0],7500円[0],8000円[0],8500円[0],9000円[0],9500円[0],10000円[0],15000円[1],20000円[0],25000円[0],30000円[0],35000円[0],40000円[0],40001円以上[0],いくらでも大丈夫！[0]) #comment_num2 2010-05-18T20:45:49+09:00 1274183149 https://w.atwiki.jp/icugakuy/pages/21.html - 金額も大きな要因ですが，やはりどこに行くかが大きいように思います．候補地によってはもう少し出してもいいし，候補地によっては，出すのが難しくなるかもしれません．また私は，夏の間は寮が締まり名古屋に帰ってしまうので，時期的には6月中がいいです．ツアー代金も安く済ませられそうですしね！ -- (陽一さん) &size(80%){2010-05-05 08:44:55} - 私も寮生活をしている間が良いです。つまり6月中か秋休みですね。なぜ予算を先に伺ったかというと、行きたいところを先に挙げて、値段を調べてみたら、金銭的にかなり厳しく、諦めなくてはならなくなる可能性が出てくるからです。そうなる可能性が出ることを防ぐために、先に予算を尋ねておこうと思いました。ではせっかくですし、希望の行き先も並行して調査しますね！また、陽一さんに質問です！6月中だと代金が安いのですか。 -- (櫻子) &size(80%){2010-05-05 08:47:52} - パッケージツアーなどは確実に安いですね。またこれは一般論ですが世の中の値段はすべて需要と供給で決まることがほとんどだと思います。よって、他大学の人や、子供の夏休み前で家族ずれの人が旅行をしにくい６月は旅館などそれ以外の物も安い可能性が非常に高いです。 -- (陽一さん) &size(80%){2010-05-05 08:49:12} - なるほど！ICUの長期休みはお出かけに都合が良いのですね。秋休みはまた行楽の季節で高くなるのでしょうか…？ -- (櫻子) &size(80%){2010-05-05 08:49:46} 2010-05-05T08:51:26+09:00 1273017086 https://w.atwiki.jp/icugakuy/pages/22.html - 候補地によってはもう少し出してもいいし，候補地によっては， -- (名無しさん) &size(80%){2010-05-05 08:38:33} 2010-05-05T08:38:33+09:00 1273016313