Wednesday, Jan. 30, 2008
The government submitted a tax
reform bill to the Diet Jan. 23 that includes a clause to continue the
provisional higher rates imposed on auto-related levies for another 10 years,
drawing opposition from the
Democratic Party of Japan,
which wants the higher
rates that have been in place for more than 30 years abolished.
 |
| Prefectural assembly members rally Jan. 23 in
Chiyoda Ward, Tokyo, to call on Diet lawmakers to retain auto-related tax rates
that are now at the center of a national debate. KYODO
PHOTO |
|
The DPJ's proposal would result in lower
pump prices,
but many local
governments fear the loss of road-related
tax revenues
would deal a heavy blow
to their coffers.
Here are questions and answers about road-related tax
revenues and the provisional tax rates that have become the hottest bone of
contention in the current Diet session:
What are road-designated tax revenues and what are
they used for?
Drivers and
car owners
pay several kinds of
taxes earmarked for building and repairing roads. These include the
gasoline tax,
diesel collection tax,
liquefied petroleum gas tax, auto acquisition tax and tonnage tax.
Known as road-designated tax revenues, they are major sources
of income for both the central and local governments.
The gasoline tax, which goes to both the central and local
government coffers, comes to ¥53.8 per liter.
In fiscal 2007, which ends on March 31, ¥5.61 trillion had
been allocated for the road-related budget.
The Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Ministry
claims road-related tax revenues are spent to improve the nation's social
infrastructure. Such usage includes planting greenery along main thoroughfares,
burying power lines, removing snow and building bridges, in addition to
constructing bypasses to reduce traffic jams and repairing sidewalks.
When were road-designated tax revenues established and
why?
The petroleum tax was first designated road-related revenue in
1954 to secure funds to develop the poor road network as the nation struggled
to rebuild after the war.
Kakuei Tanaka, who later became prime minister, came up with
the idea when he was still a rank-and-file Liberal Democratic Party
lawmaker.
In those days, cars were still extremely expensive, and
collecting tax from wealthy car owners who could afford to pay was widely
considered a clever way to amass a road construction budget.
The extra tax rates on gasoline and other car-related taxes,
except the LPG tax, were introduced in 1974 as a temporary measure to promote
further projects for road construction and repairs.
The rates have been increased up to 2.5 times over the fixed
core rate.
The temporary rates are
reviewed every five years but have remained in place since their introduction.
The current rates expire March 31.
What are the political parties' positions regarding
the special tax rates?
The LDP-New Komeito ruling bloc has submitted a bill that
includes extension of the provisional rates for another 10 years, claiming many
local governments are still in need of new roads or infrastructure
improvements.
The ruling bloc argues that without the higher rates, road
construction would be suspended in many parts of the nation where the road
network is still insufficient.
If the provisional tax rates are eliminated, the central and
local governments would lose a combined ¥1.6 trillion in resources, according
to a government estimate.
The DPJ meanwhile wants the provisional rates abolished and
have road-related taxes used for purposes other than road construction, so that
local governments could spend the funds according to their needs.
Abolishing the provisional rates would slash
gasoline prices
by ¥25 a liter.
The DPJ says local governments could survive the revenue loss
by revoking the expenses they are partly shouldering on projects carried out on
instructions from the central government.
The largest opposition force also says there is still room to
cut road construction costs as well.
The ruling coalition argues that road-related tax revenues can
be used to fight global warming. But the DPJ says the government needs to
revise the law or create a new law if it wants to use tax revenues for
environmental purposes.
To ensure the provisional rates remain beyond their
expiration, the LDP submitted a stopgap bill to the
Lower House
on Tuesday that would
keep auto-related tax rates unchanged for a few months.
Why did the temporary provisional rates last more than
30 years and now become a major issue?
What was initially designed as a temporary rate has not been
abolished for three decades because the
construction industry
has been a strong
vote-gathering machine for the LDP, which has been in power for decades, says
Yasuhiro Tase, a political science professor at
Waseda University
in Tokyo.
In 1993, when Prime Minister Morihiro Hosokawa formed a brief
non-LDP coalition administration, the rates were not up for debate because they
were in the middle of an extension period, Tase said.
Whenever a national election takes place, LDP lawmakers rely
on their local-level assembly members to promote their campaigns.
Many of those assembly members have strong ties with local
general contractors.
They expect lawmakers to get the central government to steer
as many public works projects as possible their way.
Thus, road-tax revenues have been a key political tool for LDP
politicians soliciting votes in their electoral districts.
Even if road projects were not actually necessary, it was a
win-win situation for politicians and local businesses. Road construction would
benefit local-level contractors who in return would vote for LDP lawmakers,
Tase said.
"For the LDP conservatives, politics is about roads, and an
election is also about roads," he said.
"It is a fundamental basis of Japanese politics and a
necessary evil."
Since the DPJ-led opposition camp seized a majority in the
Upper House last July, the provisional rates have become a point of hot debate,
Tase said.
In addition to local governments losing revenues, what
impact would abolishing the rates have on the public?
Several opinion polls show that a majority of voters would
welcome lower gas prices at a time when oil prices are soaring.
However, Tase noted that although the current provisional
rates expire March 31, it will be difficult for gas stations to cut gasoline
prices because the gasoline tax is incorporated into the price when gas is
shipped from oil distributors.
Tase speculates that gas stations might have to risk profits
to satisfy customers who expect lower pump prices.