daiamondfox @ ウィキ
E. Jean Carroll
最終更新:
Bot(ページ名リンク)
Personal life
- E. Jean Carroll is a Democratic Party donor.
- Reid Hoffman is a friend of Jeffrey Epstein. He is funding E. Jean Carroll's lawsuit.(*1)
Career
- E. Jean Carroll has 'sexual fantasies about Barack Obama and Russian President Vladimir Putin'.
- She also fantasises about having sexual relations with 'Ryan Seacrest, Dick Cheney and Steve Jobs'.(*2)
Religion of belief: anti-Trump.
- E. Jean Carroll is an anti-Trump activist.
- She is a fantasist and in August 2012she posted on Facebook "fantasies of having sex with Donald Trump and her own sexual fantasies".
- E. Jean Carroll filed a lawsuit claiming that she was 'raped by President Trump in 1996 when she was 53 years old'.
- However, E. Jean Carroll had never gone to the police before filing the lawsuit.
- E. Jean Carroll has also been a relentless anti-Trump campaigner on social networks in the past: in a 2018 tweet, she forced female voters who supported the MAGA movement to align themselves with her religion (anti-Trump activities).
- E. Jean Carroll's activism has been funded by the wealthy Reid Hoffman (founder of LinkedIn Corporation).(*3)
空想癖があり、2012年8月に、「ドナルド・トランプとセックスする妄想をし、自身の性的空想」をFacebookに投稿していた。
E. Jean Carroll は、「1996年、53歳の時に、トランプ大統領にレイプされた」と主張し、裁判を起こした。
しかし、E. Jean Carroll は、裁判を提起するまで、警察に相談した事は一度も無かった。
また、E. Jean Carroll は、過去のSNSにおいて、執拗に反トランプ運動を行なっていた。2018年のツイートにおいては、MAGA運動を支持している女性有権者に対して、自身の信仰する宗教(反トランプ活動)に同調する様に強要していた。)
Sexual abuse and defamation by Donald Trump
The majority of jurors are registered Democrats. x7.
- According to voter registration, the jury in the E. Jean Carroll trial was 7:1 registered Democrat.
- The number of registered Democrats is seven times the number of unregistered Democrats.
- Trump's defence team was not even allowed to know the names of the jurors before the trial.(*5)
Change a statement.
- E. Jean Carroll's testimony was changed twice. She claimed that the year of her own victimisation was 1994. But 1994 was changed to 1995. She then changed 1995 to 1996.
- There is no physical evidence (camera video recordings) to corroborate E. Jean Carroll's testimony. There is no physical evidence and no circumstantial evidence (witnesses).(*6)
The case is fully time-barred. Cases already decided before the trial. Retrospective law.
- In New York State, the statute of limitations for filing a civil lawsuit for sexual assault is generally three years.
- It was 2019 when Carroll started making noise about her rape story (1996). This means that even if her story is true, the statute of limitations has run out.
- Kathy Hochul (Governor of NY) passed the Adult Survivors Act in 2022.
- E. Jean Carroll helped pass this law.
- Kathy Hochul (Governor of NY) passed the Adult Survivors Act in 2022.
- In short, the law used in this court case is a retroactive law. A law that negates the very existence of the law itself.(*7)
キャロルがレイプ話(1996年)を騒ぎ出したのは、2019年。つまり、仮に彼女の話が事実であってとしても、完全に時効が成立している。
Kathy Hochul(NY州知事)は、2022年に「The Adult Survivors Act 」に成立させた。
E. Jean Carroll は、この法律に制定に協力している。
要するに、この裁判で使用された法律は、遡及法。法律の存在そのものを全否定した法律。)