Neg:haruna&matubayashi

09/03/13
スピーチメモです

●total stress will be high

about patients

after plan adaption

many people will think termial patients are those who don't die

though they are allowed to die.

sometimes regarded as who hesitate to die though they should die.

patients will think

"I don't want my family to suffer for me.

maybe my family want me to die.

so I should die. I want to die."

they will be under heavy pressure to die by the plan.

Because there is a choice of euthanasia,

more people who want to live more can't live.

安楽死法が実施されたオーストラリア準州ではお年寄りが法によって大変なプレッシャーを受けたことが報告されています。
出典は97年4月2日付け朝日新聞朝刊です。
「ニューサウスウェールズ州疼痛緩和ケア協会も「（安楽死は）すごいプレッシャーになっている。一部のお年寄りは最後の2、3カ月を生き延びるより、安楽死を選ぼうと感じ始めている。」と発言する。」

the report /in Asahi news paper/ in The Northern Territory, old people suffer from the pressure.
「The Northern Territory's cancer pain palliative care association said "euthanasia is heavy pressure for old people.
some of them start to think that the choice of euthanasia is better than 2-3 months life extension.」

We can't do nothing if we are not alive.

so living is the most important things for us.

at least, absolutely there are people who think like that.

For them, this probrem is very serious.

Medical treatment is for patients.

but the plan will make patients stressful. so we can't accept their plan.

about the family

after plan adaption

there will be a choice of euthanasia.

the family can't help thinking about it.

and if they think taking euthanasia to lessen their burden

they will suffer from guilty.

the plan make the family stressful too

patient's hope that they want the family to be happy

can't be come true.

about doctors.

after plan adaption,

doctors will have the posibility to kill their patients due to their own wrong diagnosis.

作家保阪正康著「人は痛みからどう解放されるか」（ベネッセ／１９９８年３月２０日発行）１３６ページからです。
「１９９３年の資料によるなら、埼玉県立がんセンターを始め国立系のがんセンターなど、緩和ケアの先頭に位置する医療機関では、モルヒネを使用することで９０％以上の患者の痛みは取り除けるというし、がんセンターの全国平均では６０％強に及ぶ。次いで大学病院では４４％強になるという。一般病院では、まだその数字が低いということだし、医師の間にもまだモルヒネを使うことの抵抗感に差があるという現実を示している。」
a writer, Hosaka /in japan
"according to the date in 1993, about cancer,
medical centers which can do most advanced palliative care say that the pain can be removed to more than 90%.
but national avarage is more than 60%, and university hospital say it is more than 44%.
in that, all pain can't be removed in general hospital yet. "

this means that by hospital, there is a difference of pain.

even if a patients start to think i want to die for the mental and phisical pain ,

the pain can be removed in other hosipitals.

ofcourse this is bad for patients.

but it is bad for doctors.

if doctors notice that the patients need not die after taking euthanasia,

they will suffer from guilty.

for a long time doctors aim to protect patients lifves.

if euthanasia legalize,

doctors' sense of value will collapse and they will confuse.

the plan make doctors stressful too.

so leagalizing can't solve the probrem.

●role of medical treatments

principle of oalliative care is trying to raise the QOL

by the way to remove the pain.

for terminal patients

it is better than euthanasia

that lessen the pain and make patient's feeling peaceful.

WHO(world health organization)/1990.8.1
「it is not the same thing as killing purpose
that using painkiller properly make patient's life shorter.」

medical treatments should save the patients.

we strongly believe that euthanasia doesn't save the patients.

the most important problem is the situation that patients want to die.

now the paatients are suffering from stressful situation.

so they want euthanasia.

peaceful death is not painful, surrounded by lovers,

to save the patients

doctors should do their best by lessening patient's pain.

euthanasia doesn't solve the situation.

so we can say that euthanasia is irrelevant way to save the patients.

and as i said, euthanasia make more stress.

we can't accept the plan.

written by haruna